Comments on: 2.6.0 + NPTL WORKING (for real this time) http://tim.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54 Take one blue frog, add caffeine and stir till the early hours of the morning. Serve with wine. Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:40:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Cameron http://tim.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-237 Cameron Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-237 " . . it took 7 seconds . . " Imagine how much faster it would be if you used c! ” . . it took 7 seconds . . ”

Imagine how much faster it would be if you used c!

]]> By: tim http://tim.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-238 tim Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-238 A pox on you. A pox on you.

]]> By: TX http://tim.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-239 TX Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-239 Didn't the recent benchmarks show Java running faster than C anyway? Didn’t the recent benchmarks show Java running faster than C anyway?

]]> By: tim http://tim.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-240 tim Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.littlebluefrog.com/?p=54#comment-240 he was just baiting me :) And I do have benchmarks which show Java running faster then C, however, the problem is that while this may be true for the benchmarks, the actual performance in proper sized applications does lag behind from a speed perspective *performance wise*, development wise, well, there is no question there. he was just baiting me :) And I do have benchmarks which show Java running faster then C, however, the problem is that while this may be true for the benchmarks, the actual performance in proper sized applications does lag behind from a speed perspective *performance wise*, development wise, well, there is no question there.

]]>